The Funrural subrogation determines who withholds the contribution upon the purchase of rural production, and the official outcome still needs to be confirmed.
The full bench of the Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF, Brazil’s Federal Supreme Court) held an in-person hearing in the claim discussing the subrogation of the Funrural (the social security contribution levied on rural production), provided for in art. 30, IV, of Law No. 8,212/1991 (the statute governing the funding of Brazilian social security). Under that rule, the purchaser of rural production deducts and remits the contribution owed by the individual rural producer and by the special insured party. The session took place on 16/10, but the official outcome does not appear in the available sources and must be confirmed before any decision is taken.
How the Funrural subrogation works on the purchase of production
In practice, the party purchasing from an individual rural producer withholds the contribution at the time of payment. It then remits the amount to the tax authorities. The producer therefore receives the sum already net of the deduction, and the purchaser is liable for the remittance.
The claim initially challenged three groups of provisions of the statute. The debate is now confined to the subrogation. Before the in-person session, the vote count in the virtual plenary ended divided along three lines of reasoning, with no majority for any of them.
What is already known about the votes and the stay of proceedings
The reporting Justice voted to dismiss the claim in its entirety. He followed the precedent that upheld the contribution payable by the individual rural employer introduced by Law No. 10,256/2001. Other Justices, however, voted for the unconstitutionality of the subrogation.
In the meantime, the nationwide stay of proceedings that have not become final and unappealable remains in force until the result is proclaimed. The reporting Justice ordered the stay in January 2025, and the court confirmed it in February of the same year. In addition, the Justices may still change their votes until the result is proclaimed.
Read further legal news with commentary by the firm and the articles by Moraes de Freitas Advogados.